By Sophia Tesfamariam
Much has been written
about the 1998-2000 “border conflict” between Eritrea and Ethiopia, and various
narratives have been produced to effectuate Ethiopia’s expansionist agendas
against Eritrea. Eritrea’s repeated calls for dialogue to resolve the “border
issues” were ignored and the irresponsible Prime Minister of Ethiopia boasted
"We shall negotiate while
we fight and we shall fight while we negotiate” as his
regime launched three successive offensives. The regime’s military adventures
cost the lives of over 120000 of Ethiopia’s sons who were used as cannon fodder
and minesweepers in its aggressive war of invasion and occupation, which
employed deadly "human wave" tactics reminiscent of WWI.
As
a result of the failure of bilateral talks and dialogue, mediation and war, the
international community had no option but to speak with one voice to resolve
the disputed or contested border. It was that unified voice that delivered the
best, most viable and mutually and legally acceptable solution; respect for the
rule of law. The international community through the UN Security Council urged
the two parties to respect the rule of law and resolve their border
"dispute" through legal and binding arbitration mechanisms.
As a result:
1.The Algiers Agreement
was signed in 2000 in Algeria by H.E. President Isaias Afwerki for Eritrea and
by Prime Minister Meles Zenawi for Ethiopia and witnessed and guaranteed by
Secretary General Kofi Annan representing the United Nations, President
Abdelaziz Bouteflika of the Democratic Republic of Algeria, President Obasanjo
of Nigeria, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright representing the United
States, Secretary General, Salim Ahmed Salim representing the OAU, and Senator
Renato Serri representing the European Union. The Algiers Agreement which was
adapted and endorsed by the UN Security Council remains a sacrosanct document.
The
UN Security Council strongly welcoming and supporting the Peace Agreement
between Eritrea and Ethiopia stated the following in its Presidential Statement[1]:
· “….The Security Council
reaffirms the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty, independence
and territorial integrity of Eritrea and Ethiopia, and further reaffirms its
continued commitment to a peaceful definitive settlement of the conflict…”
· “…The Security Council,
reiterating its strong support for the Agreement of Cessation of Hostilities
signed by the parties in Algiers on 18 June 2000 (S/2000/601), strongly
welcomes and supports the subsequent Peace Agreement between the Government of
the State of Eritrea and the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of
Ethiopia (S/2000/1183) signed in Algiers on 12 December 2000 (“Algiers
Agreement”). It commends the efforts of the Organization of African
Unity, the President of Algeria and his Special Envoy, as well as the United
States of America and the European Union for their role in achieving the
Algiers Agreement…”
· “…The Security Council
notes with satisfaction that the Algiers Agreement includes mechanisms for the
delimitation and demarcation of the common border and for addressing claims and
compensation…The Security Council recognizes that the effects of the war have
exacted a heavy toll on the civilian populations of Eritrea and Ethiopia,
including through the internal displacement and outflow of refugees. It
urges the respective Governments to continue to redirect their efforts towards
the reconstruction and development of both economies, to work towards
reconciliation with a view to normalizing their relations, and to engage in
constructive cooperation with the other neighbouring States in the Horn of
Africa, with a view to achieving stability in the subregion…”
2. The 5-member Eritrea
Ethiopia Border Commission (EEBC) was established. Eritrea selected two of the
Commissioners and Ethiopia selected the other two. The 5th Commissioner
and President of the EEBC, Professor Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, was appointed by UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan.
3. The Algiers Agreement mandated the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary
Commission (EEBC) to delimit and demarcate the border "based on
pertinent colonial treaties (1900, 1902, and 1908) and applicable international
law" The Commission was not given power to make decisions "ex
aequo et bono" and that its delimitation and
demarcation decision will be "final and binding". The
Agreement also designated the Chief of the Cartographic Section of the United
Nations as the Secretary of the Boundary Commission.
4. The parties presented to the Commission, for a period of about a
year and a half, all types of memorials and counter memorials, arguments and
documents on the "contested" and "disputed" border.
5. After a thorough review of all the evidence presented to them by
the parties to the conflict, the distinguished Commissioners delivered the
unanimous Final and Binding decision on 13 April 2002.
6. Both parties accepted the unanimous decision of the Border
Commission as Final and Binding and without pre-conditions. In fact, Ethiopia
urged the international community to enforce the decision and called on the
international community to put pressure on Eritrea to allow for the expeditious
demarcation of the border in accordance with the 13 April 2002 decision.
7. Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations and Amara
Essy, the then Secretary General of the Organization of African Unity (AU) said
that the EEBC Decision was:
"...successful conclusion of the peace process on the basis
of a legal settlement of the conflict..."
8. On the same day, 13 April 2002, that the EEBC rendered
its Final and Binding decision, the UN Security Council in its Press Release
said:
"...Members of the Security Council express their
satisfaction that a final legal settlement of the border issues between
Ethiopia and Eritrea has been completed in accordance with the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement signed by the parties in Algiers in December
2000... Members of the Security Council welcome the decision by the Boundary
Commission, announced in The Hague on 13 April 2002, which is Final and
Binding... Members of the Security Council call on the parties to cooperate
closely with the United Nations Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE) in the
implementation of the border decision, with a view to ensuring an expeditious
and orderly process for the benefit of all the people, and without
unilateral actions..."
The
African Union (AU), European Union (EU), United Nations (UN), and the United
States (US), through their respective Press Statements and Releases officially
endorsed and confirmed that the Border Commission's decision was final and
binding, and the UN Security Council adapted and endorsed it as such.
Ethiopia Reneged On Its
Treaty obligations:
The
Eritrea Ethiopia border issue was legally resolved and the chapter closed.
Therefore, there was no "disputed" or "contested"
border or territory between Eritrea and Ethiopia. Ethiopia rejected the EEBC’s
ruling and sought to re-argue, appeal, revisit, and revise the decision using
many gimmicks and ploys for a period of 5 years. Using sugar coated
niceties such as "dialogue", "normalization of relations",
“origins of conflict”, “lasting peace” etc. it attempted to hijack the sole mandate
of the EEBC to demarcate the Eritrea Ethiopia border, by asking for an
“alternative mechanism”.
In
its eloquent and clear 21 March 2003 Observations the EEBC said:
· "... It cannot allow one Party to claim for itself the right
to insist on adjustment of parts of the boundary, which that Party finds
disadvantageous..."
· "Ethiopia's reference to "the contested boundary"
can only be understood as a reference to those parts of the boundary to which
it alone and unilaterally takes exception: no part of the boundary is
"contested" by both Parties..."
To
re-argue, appeal, revisit, or attempt to revise the Final and Binding Security
Council endorsed decision would not only be a breach of the Algiers Agreement ,
it would set a dangerous precedence and would encourage the law of the jungle
over the rule of law. It would also encourage Bismarck's concept of "Might
is Right". No matter how much the minority regime in Ethiopia
tried to confuse the international community in general, and the Ethiopian people
in particular, there is no "contested" or "disputed"
border between Eritrea and Ethiopia and that fact has been consistently
ascertained and confirmed by the EEBC. After waiting for over five
years, the EEBC decided to fulfill its mandate by demarcating the border using
coordinates on maps-virtual demarcation.
Markers
or not, pillars or not, the EEBC's decisions are Final and Binding.
Therefore,
the issue is no longer about disputed or contested territories,
but rather, the issue has now become the illegal military occupation of
sovereign Eritrean territories by Ethiopia and the solution is simple and
clear. Ethiopia must remove its forces from sovereign Eritrean territories and
it must stop establishing new settlements. The UN Security Council must enforce
its own Charter and exercise its only mandate under the UN Charter, to act to
restore peace & security. It is the sole UN organ responsible for the
maintenance of regional and international peace and security, for enforcing the
UN Charter, international law, its own resolutions as well as legal and binding
arbitrations. Moreover, as stipulated in the Algiers Agreement, the UN Security
Council has the mandate and mechanism to take punitive actions under Chapter
VII against the belligerent party-in this case Ethiopia.
The
issue is no longer the "primary responsibility" of the two
governments. The issue also cannot be resolved through "dialogue".
Because the "contested" and "disputed" border
issue has been legally resolved and the legal decisions have been unanimously
endorsed by the UN Security Council, and because another disastrous war will
definitely affect regional and international peace and security, it is the sole
responsibility and obligation of the international community in general, and
the UNSC in particular, to invoke take punitive actions under Chapter VII
against Ethiopia for violating international law, and occupying sovereign
Eritrean territories for over 13 years.
By
invoking Chapter VII against Ethiopia, the international community can
collectively avoid another regional disaster and salvage its fledgling
credibility, integrity and efficacy on matters relating to peace stability and
security in the 21st Century
and beyond… Appeasing the minority regime will not lead to lasting peace or
development in the region or normalization of relations between the two
countries.
The rule of law must
prevail over the law of the jungle!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please restrict your comment to the subject matter.