“In view of the
absence of any intelligence, real or fabricated, linking Eritrea with Shabaab
for over four years, the UN Security Council should terminate sanctions imposed
in 2009 by UNSC resolution 1907.”
These are the words of a
prominent member of the American foreign policy establishment. In an article published on a, former U.S.
Assistant Secretary of State for Africa Herman Cohen said that “all available
intelligence indicates that Eritrea has not had any contact [with Somali
insurgents] since 2009.” Adding, he said, “Earlier intelligence reports, denied
by Eritrea as fabricated, indicated that the country was facilitating the
transfer of funds to Shabaab – nothing of that sort has been reported since
2009 by any source. Those of us who know Eritrea well understand
that the Eritrean leadership fears Islamic militancy as much as any other
country in the Horn of Africa region.”
The bottom-line: There is
“no intelligence, real or fabricated,”
since 2009 that can support the series of groundless charges used by the United
States, through the UN Security Council, to impose two sanctions on Eritrea,
one on December 23, 2009 (Res. 1907) and the other one two years later on
December 5, 2011 (Res. 2023).
Now, let us focus on his
choice of the word “fabricated” in
the quotation in the preceding paragraph.
We are glad he raised the possibility that the so-called intelligence on
Eritrea’s involvement in Somalia can be fabricated; this in turn opens a whole
new window for those who have been reluctant to believe that the Somalia
Eritrea Monitoring Group may have been peddling fiction with regards to
Eritrea’s role in Somalia.
This what the Organization of Eritrean Americans
(OEA) has been saying all along. All
evidence indicates that most of the fabrication has been generated by Ethiopian
operatives at and abroad, its highly-paid lobbyists in Washington, D.C., and
other capitals, as well as the minority regime’s Western enablers. Secretary Cohen is very familiar with Ethiopia’s
main foreign policy drivers for the region –unlike some of those who have been
responsible for U.S. foreign policy for the Horn the last decade and half. In a 2006 interview with the Public
Broadcasting Service (PBS), he said, “There are friends in the region, like the
Ethiopians, who probably are feeding false intelligence about terrorists being
hidden and that sort of thing, because the Ethiopians are deadly afraid of
Moslem control and also they have their own Moslem problem among the Oromo ethnic
group in Ethiopia.”
However, the primary
vessel the Ethiopian regime an its enablers use to deliver this fabricated data
has been the U.N. Monitoring Group, which is supposed to be an investigating
arm of the UN Security Council. The group’s
track record since its inception eight years ago has been devoid of any shred
of integrity or veracity. In all its past reports it showed a great deal of
capacity as a purveyor of Ethiopia’s outlandish fabrications about its
archenemy Eritrea including placing 2000 “well-armed” phantom Eritrean
“soldiers” in Somalia to serve as a cover for Addis Ababa’s invasion of that
poor Horn of African nation.
In fact, the group has
completely lost its credibility among many UN Security Council members,
including its permanent members Russia and China. In response to its 2013
report, the Russian Permanent Representative, Ambassador Vitaly Churkin,
dismissed it as “dishonest and politically motivated.”
A year earlier,
Ambassador Churkin was equally troubled by unfounded allegations against
Eritrea which led to Resolution 2023 (2011). This was how he put it: "The
text of the resolution contains a range of provisions that lack adequate
foundation, in that respect we refer in particular to the 'planned terrorist
attack' in Addis Ababa during the African Union summit there. The Russian
Federation is categorically against terrorism in all its forms and
manifestations. However, in this case, the Security Council was not presented
with convincing proof of Eritrea’s involvement in that incident. We have not
seen the results of any investigation of that incident, if indeed there was
one."
The South African Deputy
Permanent Representative, Ambassador Doctor Mashabane, reacting to the 2012,
called on the group “to execute its responsibilities and mandate ... with
professionalism, impartiality and objectivity. The Monitoring Group should
never be influenced by political considerations outside of its mandate.”
Adding, he said, “It is important for the Monitoring Group to closely guard its
independence and professionalism in the work it does to assist the Security
Council with the implementation of those measures.” He also urged the members
of the Security Council “to desist from any temptation to use the Monitoring
Group for political ends.”
The Organization of
Eritrean Americans (OEA) calls on the United Nations to put an end to this
disgraceful way of gathering data on the crisis-ridden Horn of Africa. No
wonder the crisis in this troubled region continues unabated and it is likely
to continue because the UN body mandated to gather data to help the UN Security
Council make rational decisions pertaining to the problems plaguing this
sub-region of Africa. It is a shame that the UN Security Council depends on
such fiction gathered by a group that seems to allow itself to be used as a
tool by Ethiopia and its supporters in the Ethiopia-Eritrea conflict.
The people of this
war-ravaged region deserve better from the UN and its bodies.
Released By
Organization Of
Eritrean Americans
600L Street NW
Washington, D.C, 20001
E-mail: oea@eritreanamerican.org\
Website:
www.eritreanamerican.org
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please restrict your comment to the subject matter.