Tuesday, 8 October 2013

News Report: Rwanda, Uganda Tell U.N. Envoys Peace In Congo Not Their Problem

Congo Flag

Credit: Reuters
The presidents of Rwanda and Uganda told U.N. Security Council envoys on Monday that their countries were not responsible for bringing peace to neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo's volatile east, which has long been mired in conflict and is bristling with armed groups.
Envoys from the 15-member council met with Rwandan President Paul Kagame in Kigali and then President Yoweri Museveni in Kampala after spending two days in Congo visiting the United Nations' largest peacekeeping operation.
Millions of people have been killed by violence, disease and hunger since the 1990s as rebel groups have fought for control of eastern Congo's rich deposits of gold, diamonds, copper, cobalt and uranium.
Britain's U.N. Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant said both Kagame and Museveni described an 18-month rebellion by the M23 guerrilla group as just a symptom and not a cause of Congo's problems, which were much more deep-seated in issues such as a lack of governance.
"(They said) it was really up to (Congolese President Joseph) Kabila to resolve those issues. The international community could still help, but it wasn't the responsibility of Rwanda and it wasn't the responsibility of Uganda," Lyall Grant told reporters.
"They felt that Kabila had made a lot of mistakes and that he didn't have control of his own troops and that was the fundamental issue - not anything else about cross-border interference," he said.
U.N. experts have accused Rwanda of supporting M23, which is mainly led by ethnic Tutsis, a charge that Kigali has rejected. The roots of the rebellion in the region lie in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, where Hutu troops killed 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus.
Some Security Council envoys described Kagame as defensive during the meeting. He told them that Rwanda, where Tutsis and Hutus have reconciled after the genocide, should not be lectured on what was needed to bring peace to eastern Congo.
"It's going to be the people and the countries in the region who determine whether or not there is peace," U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power told reporters after the meeting with Kagame.
"The armed groups need to be eliminated and every country in the region needs to use whatever leverage it has to get rid of those groups," said Power. "That's the only hope the people in the region have."
“We Are Not Happy”
During a visit by the ambassadors to the eastern Congolese city of Goma on Sunday, U.N. officials said while M23 had captured global headlines, just as great a threat was posed by the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) and the Islamist group Allied Democratic Forces (ADF).
M23 has accused the Congolese army of receiving military support from the FDLR, an accusation Kinshasa rejects.
Civil society leaders in North Kivu, where Goma is the capital, told the council envoys that the Congolese government controlled only about 25 percent of the province, while the rest was in the hands of dozens of armed groups.
African leaders signed a U.N.-mediated regional accord in February aimed at ending two decades of conflict in eastern Congo. Rwanda and Uganda both said they were committed to implementing the pact, U.N. diplomats said.
Museveni said he had to deploy more troops on the Ugandan border with Congo because of the threat posed by the ADF. The Ugandan government says the ADF is allied to elements of Somalia's al Shabaab movement, an al Qaeda-linked group.
Congolese forces, with the help of a new U.N. Intervention Brigade that has a mandate to neutralize armed groups, successfully pushed M23 fighters away from Goma - a city of one million people - in August. The military defeat forced M23 to return to peace talks being brokered by the Ugandan government.
During the meeting with Museveni, Lyall Grant said envoys were told "that there was a real chance of reaching agreement in the next few days," but diplomats were wary of that prediction because there were still outstanding issues to be resolved.
The United Nations said on Saturday that a third of child soldiers who had escaped from M23 were lured from Rwanda with promises of cash, jobs and education.
The United States, which has called on Rwanda to drop its support for the M23 rebels, stepped up pressure on Kigali last week by moving to block military aid over the recruitment of M23 child soldiers in its territory. [ID:ID:nL1N0HT24L]
"I don't expect you to hear me say that we are happy, we are not," said Rwandan Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo. "Rwanda does not tolerate children being enrolled in any way near armed groups, not in our own army, and that's Rwanda's position."
"Our belief is that once this crisis (in Congo) is resolved, once we get rid of these armed groups then there will be no longer the issue of child soldiers," she told reporters

News Release: Dishonesty And NNPC's Unaccountable Etiquette

Our attention was drawn to NNPC's denial of debt of N2.3 trillion being owed to the Federation Account. The statement, which is credited to Acting Group General Manager, Group Public Affairs Division, Ms. Tumini E. Green, is to say the least escapist, dishonest, contradictory and in many respect fraudulent.

While claiming that NNPC does not owe the Federation Account, "taking into account outstanding subsidies and other associated costs of operations and losses", the NNPC spokesperson claimed that payments have been made consistently into "its Central Bank of Nigeria account". At the same time Ms. Green emphatically stated that "not all revenues collected by NNPC are paid directly into the accounts of Federal Allocation with the Central Bank of Nigeria. Some are paid into the accounts of the relevant government agencies, like the Federal Inland Revenue Services and the Department of Petroleum Resources, with the CBN. But eventually, all these payments are credited to the accounts of Federation Accounts Allocation Committee, FAAC."

The question is how much was the revenue collected by NNPC? How much of it was paid to the Federation Account? How much was paid to accounts of other relevant government agencies? How much are credited to FAAC? How much was committed to the payment of so-called outstanding subsidies? What other associated costs of operations and losses incurred and how much?

Above all, what is the constitutional and legal provisions governing the management of oil revenue? Section 162(1) of the 1999 Constitution is unambiguously clear and it has directed that "The Federation shall maintain a special account to be called "the Federation Account" into which shall be paid all revenues collected by the Government of the Federation, except the proceeds from the personal income tax of the personnel of the armed forces of the Federation, the Nigeria Police Force, the Ministry or department of government charged with responsibility for Foreign Affairs and the residents of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja."

Nowhere in the Constitution has any exception been granted for any collectible revenue outside "proceeds from the personal income tax of the personnel of the armed forces of the Federation, the Nigeria Police Force, the Ministry or department of government charged with responsibility for Foreign Affairs and the  residents of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja" provided. If any other law has empower the NNPC or any other government body to do otherwise is contradictory and to that extent null and void.

We therefore wish to challenge the NNPC to go beyond hypothetical and generalized statements and categorically respond as follows:

1.    How much has been realized in oil revenue on monthly basis since January 2013?

2.    How much has been paid into any other account of any government agency?

3.    How much has been paid to settle so-called outstanding subsidy payments?

4.    What are the other associated cost of operations and losses incurred?

Problems of accountability and arbitrary management of oil revenue by the NNPC is at the center of the current FAAC dispute. The statement by Ms. Green is to say the least escapist, dishonest, contradictory and fraudulent. Mr. President needs to urgently intervene to protect the image of the Federal Government and safeguard the provisions of the 1999 Constitution. We therefore urgently call on Mr. President to call NNPC and Ministry of Finance to order.

We also would like to invite the leadership of the National Assembly to urgently take steps to protect the sanctity of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution.


Progressive Governors' Forum