By Jaye Gaskia
Our
political parties, like the politicians that have created them are strange
animals. From the very beginning I haven’t had any faith in any of the current
political parties or currently dominant politicians with respect to the
possession of any degree of capability, much less capacity to transform
positively, I a conscious manner, the
condition of our country and her citizens.
Not the even
the merger of the so-called legacy opposition parties, and the subsequent
merger of this emergent entity with the New PDP to create a viable, national
single opposition party was enough to convince me otherwise.
And events
since the emergence and ongoing consolidation of the opposition APC on the one
hand; as well as the implosion and ongoing disintegration of the ruling PDP on
the other hand have only combined to reinforce my conviction that we are still
a long way from national salvation.
Nothing
exemplifies the lack of any fundamental programmatic purpose of the parties
other than to grab or retain power than the relationship of the parties to
their purported manifestoes, as well as the absence less than four weeks to the
general elections of any concise, documented, known and accessible electoral
platforms of the candidates in general, and the presidential candidates in
particular.
Let us
examine the parties and their manifestoes. Of recent the Centre For Democracy
and Development [CDD] has been organising debates between the two main parties
[PDP & APC] on topical issues including the pillars of the economy.
I had
honored the invitation to participate in those processes fully convinced that
none of the political parties have clear cut party, as opposed to the
individual positions of politicians, on any national issue.
Alas, the
process of the debates merely confirmed what I already deduced and knew. For
instance there was a debate on the Oil & Gas sector, and the PIB as well as
the refineries and importation of refined products came up as hot issues. What
was the response of the party representatives? The PDP rep accused the
opposition of being responsible for the none passage of the PIB; while the APC
rep refuted this by stating that at that time the opposition parties were still
scattered in three parties and did not have enough numbers to have out voted
the PDP.
This was
true, nevertheless the real issue has been that all through the PIB process the
parties had no party positions on the PIB that party members in the NASS were
supposed to follow. Instead the divisions that stalled the PIB was rather
geo-political with legislators divided on a North-South line and across party
lines. Throughout the several years of the debate on the PIB at the NASS, there
was no party position, and if there was, it was muffled and not amplified. The
opposition did not come up with any opposition sponsored amendments or
alternative PIB.
This
situation was again played out during the CDD organized debates recently. For
instance only the APC rep quoted from their party manifesto, and only after
being forced to so do as a result of questions requesting to know the position
in party manifestoes on the issues.
Now this
whole situation exemplifies one of the fundamental inadequacies of the party
process in Nigeria. The manifestoes of the parties have been produced because
it is a legal requirement, and these have actually been put together by select
and or technical committees of the parties.
There were
no debates within the parties about the issues that will go into the manifesto,
much less about the issues that finally made it into the manifestoes.
The
manifestoes once produced are archived, with any reference seldom made to the
manifesto in concrete terms by politicians and leading members of the parties.
And when any reference is made to the manifestoes by party leaders it is in
general, broad and sweeping terms.
It is
debatable if upto 10% of party members are either aware of the existence of the
party manifesto, or have ever seen the party manifesto much less read through
it. Furthermore it will be quite surprising indeed if upto 5% of party members
actually understand what their party manifesto is saying.
The
conclusion that can be drawn from all of the foregoing is that what now pass
for party manifesto is actually neither a well thought out nor a thoroughly
debated position of the party known to and understood by a majority of party
members. As such the party manifesto is in reality not the manifesto of the
party, but a product of a special committee of the party and which has no
bearing on what the party is currently doing not what the party will do after
elections.
So as it is,
we are being forced into a context where we are going into a general election
with parties whose manifestoes are neither a reflection of the thinking and
action of the party, nor does it represent the party consensus on issues.
To worsen
the situation we are fated with an opposition party with a real chance of
winning the general elections, the content of whose manifesto is unknown to the
generality of electorates, and that barely three weeks to the elections is yet
to prepare, much less release for public debate any proposed policy frameworks
on any of the major issues and challenges facing the country.
This is why
it is upto us to force the parties to debate issues, to force them produce
policy proposals and to force them to make commitments that we can subsequently
hold them to account on.
But more
importantly, after this general elections the greater work we have to undertake
is the task of reforming the party structure and party process in Nigeria. We
have focused for far too long on reform of the electoral process and
institutions without looking at the parties.
And in this
process of party reforms activists and active citizens must be prepared to play
much more than a sideline role. It is incumbent on us to work together towards
establishing a model party, that can become a game changer, significant enough
to force and compel reform of the party process in general.
Along with
holding the next government to account, this task of facilitating the
establishment and evolution of a model party, fit enough to undertake the task
of National Liberation and Social Emancipation of our country and people, is our
post-election duty.
It is our
Country Let Us work towards taking it back.
(JayeGaskia is National
Coordinator of Protest To Power Movement [P2PM], and Co-convener of Say No
Campaign [SNC]).
(Follow me on Twitter:
@jayegaskia&Interact with me on FaceBook: JayeGaskia& Take Back Nigeria)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please restrict your comment to the subject matter.