![]() |
President Buhari |
Worried by chronic rigmarole in leadership absurdities by
political leaders in Africa, President Julius Nyerere of the United Republic of
Tanzania (Tanganyika and Zanzibar) had in 1994 raised an immortal theoretical
question and threw it in the direction of roguish and primordial African
political leaders. Former President Nyerere (1922-1999), as he then was, had
asked: “why is it that when Europeans, Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEANs) and North Americans are busy finding their ways to the moon, Africans
are busy going back to the cave?”. President Nyerere answered his theoretical
question by attributing it to lack of leadership vision, statesmanship,
selflessness and institutionalization of kleptomania by African political
leaders, making it possible for Africans including Nigerians to be led back to
the cave.
It is correct to say that Nigeria of today’s Buhari
administration is a clear manifestation of the Nyerere’s immortal question. We
had in the first part of this all-important public statement firmly submitted
that the Buhari administration has no vision and capacity to turn the country
around to catch up with its peers and inferiors of the 60s and the 70s such as
Taiwan, China, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, as well as Brazil,
Philippines, Kuwait, Iran, Venezuela, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, UAE and Saudi
Arabia. Even the war and dry resources ravaged Vietnam and Cambodia are in a verge of overtaking Nigeria in global
socio-economic and political leadership settings.
Presidential Sole Administrator-ship:
While it took the Buhari administration ninety (90) days to
appoint the Secretary to the Government of the Federation who ought to be
appointed days after the President’s swearing in so as to get government
running including recording and documenting official government conducts and
correspondences; there is still no Attorney
General of the Federation to handle sensitive legal matters and opinions; and
no Federal Executive Council or Federal Cabinet to put governance into full
swing and engender a sense of nationality representation and federalism.
There are also no substantive appointments into certain
federal executive bodies like INEC, etc; and no presidential adherence to
geopolitical spread in his appointments in accordance with Section 14 (3) of
the Constitution. President Muhammadu
Buhari has since his swearing in on 29th May 2015 been running Nigeria as a
presidential sole administrator. He also took recourse to procedures unknown to
the 1999 Constitution in many, if not most of his presidential appointments
particularly those he made in DSS, Custom Service, INEC and AMCON. He has
introduced a bastardization policy and a dangerous precedent in the Civil
Service of the Federation, governed by the 1999 Constitution.
The Civil Service Rules of the Federation, guided by the
1999 Constitution are constitutionally
and procedurally characterized by recruitment, remuneration, ranking or
promotion, demotion, posting or transfer, reward, sanction and retirement .
These characteristics are also the international best practices. The Civil
Service Rules of the Federation govern all civil and public service
institutions in Nigeria including the armed forces (i.e. Custom Service and
State Security Services). But in the recent presidential appointments as they
concern the acting Chairman of INEC, the DGs of SSS and AMCON and the
Controller General of the Custom Service, the President inexcusably breached
these grand rules and the Constitution by appointing a statutorily retired
director of SSS as its serving Director General. This is despite the presence
and availability of serving Deputy DGs and Assistant DGs in the Service.
In the Custom Service, the same breach manifested when he
appointed a retired army colonel as its Controller General despite the presence
and availability of serving Deputy Controllers General and Assistant
Controllers General. In INEC, the Buhari administration defied the Constitution
and appointed a National Commissioner whose five year tenure has expired as the
“acting National Chairperson of INEC”. To appoint somebody in “acting capacity”
to head any of the federal executive bodies created by Section 153 of the 1999
Constitution including INEC, the Constitution directs the President to appoint
the next most senior officer in such body whose tenure is still running. In
AMCON’s DGship, the President violated the law creating the Management by
“appointing without statutory consultation”.
Policy Directions On Employment, Business Growth, Budget
& Fiscal Management, Investment & Power Sector: In employment, no
policy direction of international standard exists so far under Buhari
administration. The employment growth is
even going from zero to super-zero. The latest development following the
presidential suspension of the Controller General of the Immigration Service
over alleged ISIS insurgency conspiracy is a clear case in point. As reported
in the media, a presidential directive from the Buhari administration has been
given for the ongoing recruitment training involving newly recruited
Immigration cadets to be discontinued. Just last March (2014), fifteen young
graduates attending the Immigration Service recruitment screening exercise died
summarily and unceremoniously. Now, if those in training are sent packing, is
the employment growth not dying under Buhari Presidency?
Further, it is a global
consensus that government is not the highest employer of labour but private
sector. Yet, private sector cannot thrive without full government support and
aides through investment friendly policies and creation of investment friendly
environment. Now, our question is: what is the policy direction of President
Buhari administration with respect to employment growth in Nigeria? In Nigeria,
presently, there are no security and freedom from want and fear that will
propel industrial investments and direct foreign investments, which, in turn,
will swallow 60% of unemployment in the country.
A number of existing multinational companies have shut down
and relocated to other countries including Ghana owing to power epilepsy and
government corruption and hash trade and investment policies including over
taxation, criminal taxation, multiple taxation and lack of international
standardized industrial vision. Till date, Nigeria has no modern trade and
investment or industrial (development) vision. Skill acquisition policy
including macro and micro credit facilities is nonexistent. The worst of all is
that the public funds needed to turn things around are legislatively siphoned
and criminally diverted by political office holders. We ask again: what are the
Buhari administration policy directions towards these?
In the area of agents of industrialization, Intersociety is
not in the know of any government projects so far awarded or ongoing by the
President Muhammadu Buhari administration. In the past three months of the Buhari
Presidency, his Federal Government has collected at least N700Billion
($3.5Billion) from the Federation Account out of the total allocations of
N1.439Trillion ($7.15illion) shared by the three tiers of Federal Government,
36 States & the FCT and 774 Local Government Areas. Yet, no single major
public contract has been awarded within the three months fiscal period.
Instead, a number of ongoing strategic public projects awarded by the past
administration, such as the 2nd Niger Bridge project, have been put on hold on
flimsy grounds. A total of 34,400 kilometers of the country’s 198,000
kilometers of road network and 3,600 kilometers of railway in the country
belong to the Buhari’s Federal Government. And our further question is: what
are their conditions and policy directions?
We also ask: Are there national carriers for Nigeria? What is the
condition of the country’s 22 local and international airports? Is there any
policy direction for them under Buhari administration? As they concern other
social services like health, food production and food security, housing, water,
environment, education, physical security and social security, what are their
policy directions under President Muhammadu Buhari administration?
On business growth, President Muhammadu Buhari
administration’s destructive policy direction is starkly manifest. In his clear
bid to destroy the Igbo nation for voting against him as a protest for steady
massacre of her sons and daughters in politically oiled insurgency and other
civil disturbances in the North; he has approved the closure of importation
using infantile economic excuses like “control of trafficking in hard
currencies” or “checking money laundering activities”. It is globally
indisputable that no country can do without importation no matter how rich
particularly as it concerns products not produced locally in commercial and
industrial quantities. The simple meaning of “global village” is that no
country can stand on its own with others.
In USA, for instance, importation policy is sustained
despite its ability to produce and export most of what it imports in commercial
quantities. USA also has crude oil discovered decades ago, yet it still imports
it. It also imports textiles and electronics from Asia following high costs
associated with their production in USA. This is for the enhancement of the
social lives of its down-top citizens. In trade and investment, balance of
trade and payment or trade surplus remain the global best practices. And these
are not achieved by outright banning of importation hiding under any cover.
To fight money
laundering or to get naira to appreciate against dominant foreign currencies,
strategic economic policy turnaround is required. President Buhari’s current monetary
policy is akin to Uganda under Idi Amin Dada, who pointed a gun on the head of
his Central Bank governor and commanded him to make his national currency
thicker than that of British Pound Sterling.
During the oil boom of late 70s in Nigeria, naira was strong following
oil-economy growth courtesy of sharp rise in the international price of crude
oil. Today, naira has depreciated steadily losing over N40.00 to US Dollar less
than three months in 2015. To make Nigeria strong and its naira internationally
competitive, there is need for “economic development” or industrialization of
the country’s 33 solid mineral deposits and agriculture, as well as steady
advancement in science and technology including information computer
technology. These must be must be propelled by purposeful and visionary
political leadership, certainly not one provided by a born before computer and
a livestock next door neighbor..
In budget and power sector management, President Buhari has
no solution in sight policy direction wise. The Nigerian budget is still
dominated by legislative corruption with 70% of same legislated into the
pockets of the public office holders using outrageous overheads including
security votes and remunerated allowances as cover. The budget policy in Nigeria
is also loan and recurrent oriented. Their formulators and implementers are
grossly corrupt and deformed. In all, funds needed for public governance are
officially hijacked and diverted by most of the country’s public office holders
leaving 170 million Nigerians to wallow in chronic penury and political
slavery. The Buhari administration has also demonstrated its public borrowing
friendliness and may most likely surpass his predecessor as Nigeria’s greatest
presidential loan borrower. In three months of his administration, over
N100Billion has been borrowed mostly by the APC-controlled States including Edo
State’s recent external loan of $75Million or N15Billion. The Presidency has
already announced its plans to secure a World Bank loan of $2.1Billion or
N420Billion for a white elephant program called “Northeast post insurgency
reconstruction”.
In power sector, a presidential policy direction known to
international power sector management best practices is not available under the
Buhari administration. Over 60 million
homes and industries in Nigeria still use
fuel and gas generators (CBN 2010) leading to trillions of naira spent
annually on fuel and gas. These have also exposed the country and ranked it
internationally as one of the world enemies of environment and a major
environmental polluter by steadily depreciating the ozone layer and shortening
human lives by extinguishing oxygen and polluting the atmosphere with harmful
automobile and power generating fumes harmful to environment and human living.
The Nigerian power sector is haunted by three hydra-headed monsters:
generation, transmission and distribution challenges.
These are powered by corruption and greed. The privatization
of generation and distribution sub power sector has not solved the country’s
power epilepsy. The power consumers in Nigeria are extorted uncontrollably by
the distribution companies under the watch of the Nigerian Electricity
Regulatory Commission (NERC). Distribution transformers are hardly provided and
maintained by the distribution companies, yet there is imposition and forceful
collection of monthly “service charge” of N650.00 per consumer running into
tens of billions of naira monthly. Issuance of outrageous and criminal bills
based on estimation are indiscriminate
and provision of prepaid meters are
hoarded and frustrated owing to their capacities to checkmate official
extortion, fraud and other billing graft practices by the distribution
companies.
In China, 40% of world’s coal production is still controlled
by the country. The Republic of Japan still generates 40% of its electricity
from coal. But in Nigeria, the power generation is still rested on gas and
water or hydrogen. The country’s coal deposits have remained largely untapped
and subsistent. Out of the world’s four major electricity sources of gas and
coal (fossil fuels), wind, solar and biomass (hydroelectric) and nuclear,
Nigeria is still battling to generate its electricity from “gas and water”;
provocatively at subsistent level. This is why the country is lagging behind
its peers and inferiors of the 60s and the 70s in all forms of human, capital,
industrial and environmental developments; no thanks to the Buhari typed
political leadership that had strangulated the country and impoverished its 170
million citizens over the years.
Signed:
Emeka Umeagbalasi (B.Sc., Criminology & Security Studies)
Board Chairman, International Society for Civil Liberties & the
Rule of Law
+2348174090052 (office)
emekaumeagbalasi@yahoo.co.uk, info@intersociety-ng.org
Uzochukwu, Oguejiofor-Nwonu, Esq., LLB, BL, Head, Campaign &
Publicity Department
Chiugo Onwuatuegwu, Esq., LLB, BL, Head, Democracy & Good
Governance Program
Obianuju Igboeli, Esq., LLB, BL, Head, Civil Liberties & Rule of
Law Program
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please restrict your comment to the subject matter.