(Corruption is high on the corporate agenda in Nigeria, however
rigorous implementation and enforcement are lacking)
84% of companies with Nigerian headquarters responding to
Control Risks’ annual survey “International Attitudes To Corruption” have
formal policies in place that explicitly forbid bribes, almost closing the gap
on the global average of 87%. This is one of a number of positive developments
highlighted in the report, published today by Control Risks, the global
business risk consultancy.
However, the implementation and enforcement of
anti-corruption programmes still lags behind many international firms:
Of companies with Nigerian headquarters:
Only 25% have a board director and/or a compliance committee
with specific accountability for anti-corruption – half of the global average
of 50% and significantly behind South Africa, with 64%
Only 34% have anti-corruption training in place for
employees and only 16% have an additional training programme for senior
executives and board members – only Indonesia (11%) and Colombia (9%) are
further behind
Only 44% have a
standard clause in agreements with sub-contractors forbidding the payment of
bribes (global average 58%)
The survey also highlighted some positive news: One of the
areas where Nigerian companies are much better prepared is in the handling of
third-party risks. 65% of respondents rated the corruption risk with regard to
third party advisors as high or very high and they acted on it: 56% of Nigerian
companies have standard procedures in place for integrity due diligence on business
partners.
Tom Griffin, Senior Managing Director, Control Risks West
Africa adds:
“We are certainly seeing a positive change in attitude and
awareness towards corruption across the region; the Buhari administration will
ensure this focus remains high on the agenda. 97% of Nigerian respondents
‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’ with the statement that international
anti-corruption laws improve the business environment for everyone. Many of our
clients value the fact that countries with the toughest laws and levels of
international enforcement – the US, Germany and the UK – show a greater willingness
to take risks and invest in countries with higher corruption risks, as they
feel protected by the strong anti-corruption programmes they are required to
implement.
“This approach from international investors is starting to
be adopted by our Nigerian clients as well who recognise that demonstrating
strong governance and compliance is a source of competitive advantage when
seeking international investment, customers and partners. However, companies
need to be aware of the potential gap between the perceived protection a
compliance programme brings and its actual mitigating effect. Reliance on a
tick-box approach to compliance can be dangerous. Most (51%) of global
respondents in our survey have conducted no internal corruption investigations
in the past two years, highlighting the danger of waiting passively for a
whistle to be blown, and perhaps suggests a culture of complacency in some
organisations.”
Friederike Brinker,
Marketing Director Europe & Africa
+49 30 533 288 55
friederike.brinker@controlrisks.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please restrict your comment to the subject matter.