By SKC Ogbonnia
The title of this piece
conveys a strident mood. But the angst is no longer because a bozo of catholic
proportion emerged as the US president-Elect. It is not because of the reality
that a labile character is set to become the leader of the free world. It has
nothing to do with the fact that a worldwide outrage greeted Donald Trump’s
triumph. And this is absolutely far from the whistling implication of the
thought that the best-qualified person ever to seek US presidency was trounced
by a definite nothing burger.
The seemingly venom is
by no means induced by the nature of the rude awakening my 13-year-old had to
endure that long night. The stolid school girl, who I had though cared less
about politics, usually goes to bed at 9 PM. But not on November 8! As soon as
I turned off the TV after major stations broke the sad news, I heard some
strange footsteps in my media room. Lo and behold, it was the little girl
wandering around perplexed and murmuring on her phone. Instead of running to
her bedroom after sighting me that late, as expected, she stood and looked my
way, unloading nonstop questions I still find difficult to answer: “Dad, what
happened? President Trump? But Hillary won when we voted in school last week,
and they said she was gonna win? What went wrong? What are the minorities gonna
do now after all he said about them? Are we gonna move to some better place?
How about Nigeria ? Has it gotten better over there since the new leader?”
Any sense of animus here
against Trump is not about any sympathy for the frustrations of women like a
Nigerian-American lady who called me the wee hour of the same fateful morning,
3.30 AM, to be exact, openly crying, praying, and truly wishing the unthinkable
that Ibrahim Babangida, a former Nigerian military head of state, is suddenly
President Barrack Obama so he could annual the US election of November 8th—for
God’s sake.
Frankly speaking, the mood
has nothing to do with any of the above. For hysteria has no place in my DNA.
The core problem, instead, is rooted in something else with the portent for
another wave of perpetual crisis.
The US “electoral
college is a disaster for a democracy." But that is not SKC Ogbonnia
fomenting such notion from the start. The original quote was precisely the
reaction of no other person than Donald Trump himself following Obama’s victory
over Mitt Romney in 2012. If the quote is remotely vague, “what Trump means to
say”, as his surrogates would always spin, is that the system that produces the
leader of the free world is a disaster. There is hardly a thing an objective
person can wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Trump, because the celebrity cretin
does not espouse any core values or beliefs. But one cannot agree with the man
any more that whatever system that made it possible for him to emerge as US
president-elect is truly a disaster.
The U.S. presidential
elections of the last five decades (1966-2016) sufficiently highlight the
challenges of the American democracy. Even though both Presidents Richard Nixon
and Bill Clinton received less than 50% of votes cast in the 1968 and 1992
general elections, respectively; they still assumed power on the basis of the
Electoral College system. Clinton would also be re-elected in 1996 with only a
minority of the votes cast for the same reason. But none is more perplexing
than the 2000 presidential election where George W. Bush emerged victorious
despite garnering fewer popular votes than Al Gore. Even worse, not only is
Donald J. Trump widely seen as unqualified to be president of the United
States, he was declared the winner in the 2016 elections despite losing the
popular vote to Hillary Clinton.
What is more, it is not
entirely a coincidence that each of the former presidents mentioned above could
not prove the electorate wrong. Nixon had to resign from office in shame. Bill
Clinton became the second US president in history to be impeached. And George
W. Bush left office forlorn. Mr. Trump? The guess is open-ended. In fact,
since the morning after November 8, the whole world has been on its knees
hoping that the 70-year-old enfant terrible could ever grow to comport himself
as a leader of the free world. But mere hope can only take us so far. The past
remains a relevant predictor of the future. Expecting a pig to fly as high as
the bird is no different than leading a merry chase. Even if Donald Trump can
show any remorse and do some good moving forward, the havoc this man has
already unleashed on human civilization can never be undone.
Yet we can not entirely
discount hope, because “there is God.” The living God has not abandoned
the United States , as Donald Trump wildly claimed. The image of the
pathological liar alone is enough to finally provoke the Americans to demand a
more deserving change. The change calls for the country to discard the archaic
Electoral College system that produced an unrepentant heathen as US
president—by default. This change requires an amendment to the outdated US
Constitution in line with an ever-changing society towards the greater good.
The ultra conservatives
will ultimately liken this proposal to the naked slaying of the utmost totem,
but the main idea is far from novel. In the book, How Democratic Is the
American Constitution?, Robert Dahl, fondly remembered as the Dean of
American Political Scientists, had ridiculed the US Constitution immediately
after the 2000 election that saw George W. Bush prevail with minority votes.
Dahl called for change, charging that the ideal Constitution is one “that,
after careful and prolonged deliberations, we and fellow citizens conclude is
the best designed to serve our fundamental political ends, goals, and values.”
Make no mistake about it, the existing Constitution has served America
reasonably well and is deserving of a sacred place in history. But it is far
from perfect.
The problem here is that
a defining imperfect area of the US Constitution, the Electoral College, is
profoundly polar opposite to democratic principles. America needs a system that
can guarantee that the majority truly carries the votes. Moreover, it defies
logic that the US citizens will continue to glue their thinking faculty to a
document adopted over two centuries ago by ancient dwellers—to cope with the
complexities of the Post-Modern era. The blind following of ideology rather
than prudence is a recipe for disaster. That is how America gave us the Iraq
war and the perpetual crisis that has followed. That is how and why the world
is now grappling with the reality that a gambling goofus is soon to become the
sole custodian of America ’s nuclear code. It’s gloomy, square.
(Ogbonnia wrote from Houston , Texas , USA. He can be
reached via: SKCOgbonnia@firsttexasenergy.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please restrict your comment to the subject matter.